As on 21-Apr-2015 17:00:00 IST Cumulative Demand (no. of shares in lakhs) Bid Price (Rs.) Note: Cumulative bid quantity at each price point includes the quantity bid at that relevant price point and all valid bids at the next higher price point. The graph is updated every hour.
Total Issue Size 4,02,89,225 Total Bids Received 70,83,000 Total Bids Received at Cut-off Price 12,69,000 No. of times issue is subscribed 0.18
Bid Details for MEPIDL as on 21-Apr-2015 14:02:57 IST Sr. No Category No of Shares offered/Reserved No of shares bid for No of times of total meant for the category 1 Qualified Institutional Buyers(QIBs) 2,74,32,083 0 0.00 1(a) Foreign Institutional Investors(FIIs) 0 1(b) Domestic Financial Institutions(Banks/ Financial Institutions(FIs)/ Insurance Companies) 0 1(c) Mutual funds 0 1(d) Others 0 2 Non Institutional Investors 77,14,285 0 0.00 2(a) Corporates 0 2(b) Individuals(Other than RIIs) 0 2(c) others 0 3 Retail Individual Investors(RIIs) 51,42,857 2,00,025 0.04 3(a) Cut Off 1,91,025 3(b) Price bids 9,000 Total
As on 21-Apr-2015 13:00:00 IST Cumulative Demand (no. of shares in lakhs) Bid Price (Rs.) Note: Cumulative bid quantity at each price point includes the quantity bid at that relevant price point and all valid bids at the next higher price point. The graph is updated every hour.
Total Issue Size 4,02,89,225 Total Bids Received 4,00,275 Total Bids Received at Cut-off Price 3,92,625 No. of times issue is subscribed
As on 21-Apr-2015 12:00:00 IST Cumulative Demand (no. of shares in lakhs) Bid Price (Rs.) Note: Cumulative bid quantity at each price point includes the quantity bid at that relevant price point and all valid bids at the next higher price point. The graph is updated every hour.
Total Issue Size 4,02,89,225 Total Bids Received 1,78,875 Total Bids Received at Cut-off Price 1,75,500 No. of times issue is subscribed 0.00 Graph Logic
55. Rkg| Link| Bookmark|
April 21, 2015 1:00:15 PM
Top Contributor (500+ Posts, 200+ Likes)
Why to ask this question again and again? The final answer is........KAPDE UTER JAYENGE. Matter is closed once for all.
1) Exorbitantly priced premium for a loss making company. 2) Business model subject to high risks, especially with new govt re-considering tolled roads 3) Dishonest promoters.
I dont think of applying at negative returns its a clear cut avoid what would I do of revenue growth when its not turned in profit. Even the issue will not subscribe fully. Avoid Mep
With regard to consistent losses it mainly attributing to two factors Company secured one large OMT project in 2010 by upfront payment of Rs 21000 mn whole amount funded through debt..High interest cost & amortization dented the balancesheet. It structured in such a way that it bound to generate losses atleast for 5-6 years from commencement. Hoverver project generates substantial cashflows to meet its finance obligation & cash profitable Another reason could be one of its OMT project Chennai Bypass witnesses loss of revenue due to non revision of toll rates and company raised the claim with NHAI and write off the same from profits
Pros MEP operates in unique & high growth industry, revenue grew four times in last five years. With NHAI expected to award over 20000 kms of road over next 3 years, this will open huge industry and being a pan india player mep can continue this momentum
Institution portion is very high @75% in this issue
Cons Highly geared company Some of its projects faced certain issues in past and company raised for compensation